Wiebe E. Bijker (1951) was educated as an engineer (physics) at Delft University of Technology, then studied philosophy of science at the Universities of Amsterdam and Groningen, and received a PhD in the history and sociology of technology from Twente University.
Partly parallel to his physics and philosophy education he taught physics in secondary school and co-authored a series of schoolbooks that combined physics, chemistry and biology. He was active in the ‘science, technology and society’ (STS) movement, and helped to translate its insights into secondary school science teaching. This interest in teaching continued, as witnessed by Bijker’s central role in designing the teaching programme of the Netherlands Graduate School of Science, Technology and Modern Culture (WTMC), in establishing the European Association on Society, Science and Technology (with its European MA programme ESST), in developing and teaching a separate line of history, philosophy and sociology of science in Maastricht University’s medical school, and in creating and directing the NVAO-accredited research master Cultures of Arts, Science and Technology (CAST). He has always continued some undergraduate teaching activities and responsibilities.
Bijker held a variety of administrative offices in Maastricht University, nationally, and internationally. He was Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (1996 – 2000) and he helped to establish the KNAW-Maastricht Virtual Knowledge Studio in 2007. Nationally he played key roles in the graduate school WTMC and in the creation of the KNAW Virtual Knowledge Studio (2002-2006). Internationally his Presidency of the Society for Social Studies of Science and various roles in the Society for the History of Technology stand out. (The numbers below [in square brackets] refer to the key publications.)
Bijker’s research took off from his interest in the relations between science, technology and society that already guided his studies in Delft and his involvement in secondary school science education. He used historical case studies (aluminium, bicycle, Bakelite, Sulzer weaving machine, transistor) to ask sociological questions about technology development. Bijker formulated in 1983 the ‘social construction of technology’ (SCOT) heuristics and theory . Joining forces with sociologists of science and historians of technology, this led to the 1987 volume The Social Construction of Technological Systems that came to be considered the beginning of ‘the new sociology of technology’ . In the 1990’s he broadened both the research agenda and the theoretical and empirical scope of technology studies . The research questions were broadened to also address normative and political issues of technology, science and society. Theoretically this required new conceptions of technological culture, power, democracy, and vulnerability. New strategic research sites for his empirical studies included health and medicine, town planning and architecture , gender and technology , sound studies, coastal engineering, and development studies. The successful demonstration by constructivist science and technology studies that knowledge and technology can be understood as social processes could easily—though erroneously— lead to the conclusion that anything goes and that there is nothing special about scientific knowledge or technical expertise. A detailed analysis of the inner workings of the Health Council of the Netherlands gives a new conceptualization of the role of scientific expertise in modern societies .
An important effect of the broadening of the research programme—and one in which new connections between research and teaching are emerging—is the engagement of technology studies with other scholarly disciplines (such as economics, political sciences , philosophy), and with practitioners (such as engineers and scientists), policy makers, and civil society groups. For his advisory work Bijker actively draws on his triple background in physics, philosophy, and history & sociology of technology. Especially in his chairing advisory committees of the Health Council of the Netherlands he is thus able to build bridges between the natural sciences and the humanities and social sciences. Recently granted EU projects aim deliberately at forging cooperation between the natural and social sciences.
In his Presidential Address to the Society for Social Studies of Science Bijker argued in 2001 for a new role of STS researchers as public intellectuals . Following the events of ‘9/11’ he helped to formulate new ways for science and technology studies of engaging with questions of security, risk and vulnerability  and with issues of development in the global south . This led to Bijker’s involvement in the formulation of new research programmes for NSF/ESF and the building up of a new research line in his research group in Maastricht. This engagement between academic work and the practices of science and technology for development is supported by his role as co-founder of the Knowledge in Civil Society Forum (KICS, Hyderabad, India) and by various EU-FP7 projects.
In 2006 Bijker received the John Desmond Bernal Prize, awarded jointly by the Society for Social Studies of Science and the Thomson Scientific, for his distinguished contribution to the field of science and technology studies. In 2009 he was appointed Officier in de Orde van Oranje Nassau. In October 2012 Bijker received the Leonardo da Vinci medal from the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT) which is awarded “to an individual who has made an outstanding contribution to the history of technology, through research, teaching, publications, and other activities.”
- http://www.revistaenie.clarin.com/notas/2009/10/15/_-02019450.htm: Interview (Spanish) by Bruno Massare in Clarin, Argentina's largest daily newspaper, in its Saturday magazine Ñ, Revista de Cultura: "De paso por Buenos Aires, uno de los fundadores de la nueva sociología de la tecnología, el holandés Wiebe Bijker, habló con Ñ sobre esta disciplina que impulsa la participación ciudadana en el debate sobre el desarrollo tecnológico. "No se pueden reducir las decisiones a científicos y políticos", sostiene."
- Interview (Nederlands) door Femke Kools ter gelegenheid van de Diës Natalis van de Universiteit Maastricht, gepubliceerd op de UM website: Bijker Dies Natalis interview 2009.pdf
- Interview (Nederlands) in Jaarverslag 2006 Gezondgeidsraad door Mieke de Waal: Bijker GR Jaarverslag 2006.pdf
- Interview (Nederlands) door Anna Wolters in Mozaïek: Bijker Mozaiek2007.pdf
- Interview (Nederlands) in NRC door Michiel van Nieuwstadt: Bijker NRC25032007.pdf
- Interview (English) by Femke Kools, in Observant of 11 December 2008, on "What makes a good reseracher?": Bijker Observant Dec08 Eng.pdf
- Interview (Nederlands) by Femke Kools, in Observant of 11 December 2008, on "What makes a good researcher?": Bijker Observant Dec08 NL.pdf
- Interview (English) by Irene Smeets in Observant: Bijker Observant June2007.pdf
- Citation 2012 Leonardo da Vinci medal, SHOT, October 2012: Bijker_daVinci_citation.pdf
- Brief CV in NSF format (4 pp): Bijker-NSF-07.doc
- Full CV Wiebe Bijker: CV Bijker Dec2012.pdf
- Interview (in Spanish): Boczkowski, P. J., & Bijker, W. E. (2005). ¿Cómo y por qué es importante la tecnología? REDES, revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, 11(21), 19-53.: Interview REDES
- Interview Observant (NL) over onderzoek 2007: Observant 'TopDog' NL 2007.pdf
- Interview Observant (NL) "Zing, Huil, Bid, Vecht, ...", Nov 2012: Observant ZingHuilVecht NL Nov2012.pdf